This content is included in your SPKN Membership

The Power of Athlete Autonomy

AUTHOR:

Eli Waxler

Link to Resource

In sports, motivation is often chalked up to sheer willpower. But behind high-performing teams and resilient athletes is something more sustainable: autonomy-supportive coaching.

Rooted in Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985), autonomy support isn’t about letting athletes do whatever they want—it’s about creating an environment where athletes want to do what they’re doing. It’s coaching that aligns with their values, goals, and sense of purpose.

What Is Autonomy Support in Sport?

Autonomy is the feeling of acting with a sense of choice and ownership. It’s one of the three core psychological needs identified in Self-Determination Theory—along with competence and relatedness—that athletes need to thrive.

In practice, autonomy-supportive coaching means:

  • Providing structure with input from athletes
  • Explaining the why behind drills and strategies
  • Respecting athlete perspectives
  • Encouraging self-reflection and ownership

This approach doesn’t eliminate discipline—it strengthens it by giving athletes a voice in how structure is applied.

Why Autonomy Support Works

Research consistently shows that autonomy-supportive coaching leads to:

  • Stronger intrinsic motivation – athletes engage because it matters to them
  • Better performance under pressure – internal motivation sustains effort when things get tough
  • Lower burnout and dropout rates – especially in youth and early-career athletes
  • Improved well-being and life satisfaction – both in and out of sport

When athletes feel heard and involved, they’re more likely to commit, bounce back from setbacks, and grow through sport—not just in it.

3 Practical Strategies to Support Athlete Autonomy

You don’t need a personality shift—just consistent behaviors. Here’s how to integrate autonomy into daily coaching:

1. Offer Meaningful Choices Let athletes choose between two warm-ups or take on leadership roles. Even small decisions build engagement and show respect.

2. Explain the Why Don’t just say “Do this drill”—connect the task to their goals: “This will sharpen your reaction time in late-game scenarios.”

3. Listen and Validate Even if a decision isn’t up for debate, acknowledging how an athlete feels builds trust and reinforces their agency.

What Autonomy Support Is Not

It’s easy to misunderstand autonomy support as leniency, but that’s far from the truth.

  • It’s not permissive. Boundaries still exist—coaches just enforce them in respectful, collaborative ways.
  • It’s not unstructured. Structure actually enhances autonomy when athletes help shape it.
  • It’s not slower. While explaining and listening may take time up front, it saves time in the long run by reducing resistance and disengagement.

Supporting the Coach, Too

Coaches can only give what they have. Those who feel supported in their own roles—through reflection, peer learning, and leadership autonomy—are more likely to coach in an autonomy-supportive style.

Ask yourself:

  • Do I explain the reasoning behind our training choices?
  • Do I use guilt or pressure, or do I foster collaboration?
  • Where can I offer more ownership to my athletes?

From Theory to Practice

Autonomy-supportive coaching isn’t just a theory—it’s a mindset, a set of habits, and a long-term strategy. When athletes feel empowered, they don’t just show up—they buy in. And when they buy in, performance, resilience, and joy follow.

Coaches don’t lose authority by giving athletes a voice—they gain trust, loyalty, and lasting impact.

References

Amorose, A. J., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2007). Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: A test of self-determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 654–670.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., Amoura, S., & Baldes, B. (2010). Influence of coaches’ autonomy support on athletes’ motivation and sport performance: A test of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(2), 155–161.

Isoard-Gautheur, S., Guillet-Descas, E., & Lemyre, P. N. (2012). A prospective study of the influence of perceived coaching style on burnout propensity in high level young athletes: Using a self-determination theory perspective. The Sport Psychologist, 26(2), 282–298.

Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(11), 883–904.

Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218.

Reinboth, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motivation and Emotion, 28(3), 297–313.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.

Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57–68.

Stebbings, J., Taylor, I. M., & Spray, C. M. (2011). Antecedents of perceived coach autonomy supportive and controlling behaviors: Coach psychological need satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33(2), 255–272.