The Two Different Worlds of Black and White Fraternity Men: Visibility and Accountability as Mechanisms of Privilege

This content is included in your SPKN Membership

Study Details

Authors
Rashawn Ray, Jason A. Rosow
Published
2012
View the study
Citation
Ray, Rashawn & Jason A. Rosow. 2012. The two different worlds of black and white fraternity men: Visibility and accountability as mechanisms of privilege. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 41(1): 66-94.

There has been limited empirical research on how individuals “do privilege.” As a result, our understandings are incomplete about how high-status groups continue reaping the benefits of privilege. Using data from fifty-two men in three white and four black fraternities at a predominately white institution, this paper demonstrates that visibility and accountability function as mechanisms of privilege. Because of a large community size, central fraternity house, and influential alumni, white fraternity men are afforded a hyper level of invisibility and unaccountability. Because of the small black community and the obligation black fraternity men perceive having to be the ideal black student, they reap a hyper level of visibility and accountability based on expectations from and interactions with a host of others (e.g., university officials, white students, black community, women). By showing how high-status whites epitomize an ideal white racial identity and preserve inter- and intra racial boundaries, we advance theoretical discussions on hegemonic whiteness.

Leave a Reply