Some Threads Worth Caring About in a Corresponsive Sport Science

This content is included in your SPKN Membership

Study Details

Authors
Alex Lascu
Published
2024
View the study
Citation
Lascu, A. (2024). Some Threads Worth Caring About in a Corresponsive Sport Science. Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02048-7

The article discusses the concept of a “corresponsive sport science,” which challenges traditional approaches to sport science and coaching by emphasizing curiosity, care, and hope in both scientific inquiry and practical coaching. In essence, the article advocates for a shift in how sport science and coaching are approached, urging a move away from rigid, knowledge-based frameworks towards a more fluid, responsive, and caring practice that values direct experience and ecological relevance.

 Here are the key points and takeaways:

Critique of Traditional Sport Science:

  • Traditional sport science is critiqued for being overly focused on objectivity, certainty, and the accumulation of knowledge without considering its practical relevance or applicability in real-world coaching.
  • The scientific method is viewed as sometimes insensitive to the actual needs of coaches and athletes.

Importance of Ecological Validity:

  • The article emphasizes the importance of ecological validity, which refers to the relevance and applicability of research findings in real-world settings.
  • Coaches are encouraged to question the practical value of scientific findings and to consider how they can be applied meaningfully in their coaching practice.

Liberating Element of Corresponsive Sport Science:

  • A corresponsive sport science encourages coaches to accept that they don’t need to know everything. The pursuit of knowledge should be driven by curiosity and should not impose an unrealistic expectation of certainty.
  • The approach challenges pervasive ideas such as anthropocentrism, capitalism, and datafication in sport science.

Value of Not-Knowing:

  • Embracing uncertainty and not-knowing is seen as a strength rather than a weakness in coaching.
  • This mindset allows coaches to remain open to new possibilities and to be more responsive to the dynamic and evolving nature of sport.

Caring in Coaching and Science:

  • Care is highlighted as a central component of both coaching and scientific inquiry. It involves being actively engaged in the learning process and responding thoughtfully to what is found.
  • Curiosity and care should drive both scientific research and coaching practice, leading to a deeper, more meaningful engagement with the subject matter.

Integration of Science and Coaching:

  • Science and coaching as interconnected practices that should inform and enrich each other. Rather than being separate domains, they are woven together through active participation and engagement.